

The Learner and Learning in a Digital Age
The new generation of learners processes information, communicates, and engages with the world in vastly different ways compared to previous eras. This module explores how the digital age has shaped the cognitive capabilities, learning preferences, and social-emotional development of students. It examines the instructional design, best evidence-based practices in classrooms, and multisensory practices as they adapt to meet the needs of diverse learners shaped by ubiquitous technology and digital experiences. The module delves into strategies for leveraging digital tools and fostering digital literacy to optimize learning, cultivate essential 21st century skills, and prepare students for success in an increasingly technology-driven world.
Unit 1: Understanding the learner
Literacy guide
Evidence-Based Practices in the Classroom
The field of education has been making great efforts for several years to implement evidence-based practices or programs (EBPs). In general, an EBP is one whose effectiveness is supported by rigorous research. In other words, research shows that the practice or program works in all teaching environments. This instructional practice differentiates successful teaching and includes the belief that all students can succeed.
Useful links:
What Is Evidence-Based Instruction?
Simple Ways to Integrate Four Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies
Multisensory Practices within Phonology
Understanding multisensory practices can allow teachers to open the doors of literacy to students. Multisensory learning is also an effective way to make teaching inclusive, as it offers a wide range of strategies for children to learn, and does not depend upon just listening, writing, and reading alone.
-
Visual - learning through watching and seeing;
-
Auditory - learning through listening and hearing sounds;
-
Kinesthetic - learning through physical activity or body movement (this involves the vestibular and proprioceptive senses);
-
Tactile - learning through using the sense to touch;
-
Olfactory and Gustatory - learning through smell and taste.
1. How would you teach explicit, systematic, and sequential single and multisyllabic word reading
I would teach explicit, systematic, and sequential single and multisyllabic word reading, beginning with foundational phonics instruction that introduces letter-sound correspondences in a clear, step-by-step manner. This would help provide framework and the foundation for learners to decode regular one-syllable words. Later they can continue with more complex multisyllable words identification while analyzing the morphological structure of such advanced words. I will use the following strategies: explicit instruction and modeling, sequencing, progression from simple to complex, guided practice with more independent work if a student demonstrates growth and confidence in developing reading skills. Frequent constructive feedback is important at all steps.
2. How would you teach orthographic mapping for regular and irregular words
Orthographic mapping is the process of forming connections between the spellings, pronunciations, and meanings of words in memory. To teach this for both regular and irregular words:
- visually and with audio support guide learners in analyzing word patterns and recognizing common letter combinations;
- use analogies and examples to decode unfamiliar words
- explicitly instruct on recognizing morphological parts of words (roots, prefixes, and suffixes) and provide related activities (recognizing, sorting);
- provide multiple exposures to high-frequency words;
- use associations/mnemonics for irregular words that don’t follow phonics rules.
3. How do variations in phonology across dialects and speech patterns affect the development of phonemic awareness?
The examples of variations in phonology across dialects/speech patterns: different pronunciations, omission/addition of certain sounds.
Impact: difficulty identifying, manipulating sounds that differ from their own dialect/speech pattern.
What should I do:
- be aware of regional, cultural differences;
- adjust instruction accordingly, recognizing the variety of students' home languages and dialects in the classroom;
- explicitly teach the phonological patterns using standard academic language;
- provide opportunities engaging students in auditory/speaking activities to help them develop listening, sound recognition, speaking skills, etc.
4. How do evidence-based and multisensory practices support the development of phonemic awareness?
Evidence-based, multisensory practices support the development of phonemic awareness in the following ways:
- besides improving the literacy (includong phonemic awareness) such practices engage students of multiple learning modalities (according to Gardner’s theory);
- help create connections by pairing visual/kinesthetic/auditory experience to learning phoneme recognition and manipulation, and their written forms.
5. What is one evidence-based practice that you could incorporate into your teaching to connect reading and writing that enhances comprehension and student engagement?
As I don’t directly teach reading and writing in middle-high school (only higher level techical vocabulary in Design Technology/Computer Science), I will give an example from my experience of being a Girl Scout Leader in Beijing for a group of brownie-age (grade 1 - grade 2) girls. I organize a variety of activities to support holistic development of my troop members, such as STEM activities, hiking/camping, art activities and gallery visits, yoga, etc. There was one meeting with a theme “Senses”. I provided them with a variety of aroma smells and fruits (like durian, raspberries) to smell with closed eyes. Then I asked them to create a mindmap - for 3 favorite smells (associations, feelings, what reminds them of, adjectives) - they could draw and/or write. Then, one by one, they were reading aloud what they wrote. At all steps - I was supporting them (if they didn’t know how to write a word - “map from sounds to letters”) I was explicitly instructing (visually - on the board and auditiory “pronouncing”). I was providing immediate feedback. After such activities - girls feel more confident about their writing skills. They are able to connect phonemic awareness and writing to smelling, picturing and to overall fun experience.
Reference:
Esplendori, G. F., Kobayashi, R. M., & Püschel, V. A. A. (2022). Multisensory integration approach, cognitive domains, meaningful learning: reflections for undergraduate nursing education. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 56, e20210381. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0381
Mometrix Academy. (2022, December 20). Components of oral language [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeNiIMAcsvU
Nordengren, C. (2024, January 7). 10 ways to meet the learning needs of all students. Teach. Learn. Grow. https://www.nwea.org/blog/2023/10-ways-to-meet-the-learning-needs-of-all-students/
Unit 2: Language Acquisition, Cognitive Development, and Literacy in the Digital Age
Second language acquisition impacts learners in various ways:
- cognitive benefits (improved problem solving skills and skills within other academic domains)
- metalinguistic and cultural awareness (better understanding of various languages and cultures, exposure to different perspectives, etc)
- motivation (increased confidence, self-efficacy, engagement in learning)
- cross-linguistic transfer (easier to learn other languages)
For this activity, I have researched the following journal article: "The Realization of Gardner's Multiple Intelligences (MI) Theory in Second Language Acquisition (SLA)." Understanding the individual cognitive factors that contribute to successful second language acquisition (SLA) is an important goal and a topic of great interest for many researchers in the field of language studies. Gardner's (1983) Theory of Multiple Intelligences has demonstrated that intelligence, as an individual cognitive factor, has a significant influence on the process of SLA and can account for the variability observed in learners' second language learning.
Applying the Theory of Multiple Intelligences allowed some educators and language researchers to re-evaluate their classroom practices (general education or/and other various areas of language teaching and learning).
This paper outlines the concept of intelligence and the role of intelligence in major SLA approaches through a detailed literature review. Additionally, Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences is outlined, and its key features are discussed in detail.
Finally, drawing on the role of Multiple Intelligences, this paper describes applications and implications of this theory in relation to second language teaching and learning. This should provide a clearer picture of the relative importance of intelligence among the amount of factors associated with second language acquisition.
The conclusion of the paper is the following:
Individual cognitive and affective factors like aptitude, introversion/extroversion, fieldindependent/field-dependent, motivation, empathy, anxiety, self-confidence, self-regulation, inhibition, and many others have an important influence on the speed and ease of second language learning and this is why some people are more successful language learners while others are not.
Regarding classroom instruction, teachers should provide conditions that encourage students to utilize all types of intelligence. While some students may prefer to use certain intelligence types, teachers should recognize and teach to a broader range of talents and skills that depend on a variety of intelligences.
Since teachers themselves might have preferences for particular intelligences, one key implication of the Multiple Intelligences (MI) theory is for teachers to start identifying their own intelligence profiles. This allows them to determine their best or preferred teaching strategies, taking into account human differences.
After identifying their own intelligence preferences and the impact this may have on their teaching, the next step is to profile the students. Research has found that the more aware learners are of their intelligence profile, the better they can utilize this knowledge in their future learning.
Teachers can also take advantage of exercises, activities, techniques, and materials that help stimulate their students' intelligences, encouraging them to make use of different intelligences in the learning process.
Another implication of MI theory for teachers is that by paying attention to all kinds of intelligence, they can design a syllabus that takes advantage of a variety of games, stories, music, images, as well as different tools and materials intended to engage multiple intelligences. This, in turn, is useful for teachers in that it can awaken all kinds of intelligences in their students. It also helps strengthen the creativity of teachers by freeing them from relying solely on textbooks and encouraging them to design a syllabus appropriate for the level of their students.
References
Maftoon, P., & Sarem, S. N. (2012). The Realization of Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences (MI) Theory in Second Language Acquisition (SLA). Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(6), 1233–1241.